Pharmacology

mod_vvisit_countermod_vvisit_countermod_vvisit_countermod_vvisit_countermod_vvisit_countermod_vvisit_countermod_vvisit_counter
mod_vvisit_counterToday21225
mod_vvisit_counterYesterday45353
mod_vvisit_counterThis week112653
mod_vvisit_counterLast week114874
mod_vvisit_counterThis month338737
mod_vvisit_counterLast month615258
mod_vvisit_counterAll days7607069

We have: 366 guests, 15 bots online
Your IP: 207.241.226.75
Mozilla 5.0, 
Today: Apr 17, 2014

JoomlaWatch Agent

JoomlaWatch Users

JoomlaWatch Visitors



54.9%United States United States
12.8%United Kingdom United Kingdom
6.1%Canada Canada
4.8%Australia Australia
1.7%Philippines Philippines
1.6%Germany Germany
1.6%Netherlands Netherlands
1.5%India India
1.3%Israel Israel
1.3%France France

Today: 115
Yesterday: 237
This Week: 833
Last Week: 1717
This Month: 3802
Last Month: 7304
Total: 24602


CAPITOL HILL FORUM REPORT PDF Print E-mail
User Rating: / 0
PoorBest 
Grey Literature - DPF: Drug Policy Letter spring 1995
Written by Drug Policy Foundation   
Saturday, 22 April 1995 00:00

On Friday March 10, DPF brought top researchers and advocates to Capitol Hill to make the case for needle exchange programs. The event was preceded by a week's worth of national publicity DPF generated by leaking suppressed government documents about needle exchanges to the media. Government officials, congressional staffers, activists and reporters packed the room in the Rayburn House Office Building to hear about the issue.

A key issue at the forum was the question of whether the federal government should fund existing needle exchange programs and provide start-up money to new programs.

dpf9507

Currently, federal funding is banned unless health agencies find that the programs curb HIV's spread and do not increase drug use. Evidence supporting both conclusions has built steadily, and in late 1993, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) said the feds should fund the programs. Unfortunately, that recommendation–along with other health agenices' comments on needle exchange research – was kept secret until DPF leaked it March 7.

The CDC was motivated to take its pro-needle exchange position by the most thorough research on the topic ever undertaken: A federally funded study by University of California researchers. Among other things, that study showed four different ways in which needle exchanges are likely to reduce HIV transmission. Also, the UC study found no evidence that the programs increase drug use in their communities or among their clients.

dpf9508

To explain his findings, DPF brought the lead researcher from the study, Dr. Peter Lurie of UC San Francisco, to Washington. Also on the forum program were Yale University professor Edward Kaplan, who designed an award-winning method for measuring needle exchange's impact on HIV transmission, and Ernie Drucker, a DPF board member with more than 20 years' experience in harm reduction programs. The program was rounded out by the Washington, D.C., premiere of "Fire in Our House," a new 10-minute video on needle exchanges produced by Vanessa Vadim and Rory Kennedy of MayDay Media.

Copies of a videotape of the forum, which includes "Fire in Our House," are available for $35 from DPF.The MayDay Media video is also available separately for $15, and includes a resource guide and other information. It is also available through DPF.

 

Our valuable member Drug Policy Foundation has been with us since Monday, 20 February 2012.

Show Other Articles Of This Author