The Global War on Stealth Underwear
By Robert Scheer
www.truthdig.com
December 30, 2009
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article24288.htm

There is no "war" against terrorism. What George W. Bush launched and Barack Obama insists on perpetuating does not qualify. Not if by war one means doing the obvious and checking a highly suspicious air traveler's underwear to see if explosives have been sewn in. If Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab had put the stuff in his shoes we would have had him because that was tried before, but our government was too preoccupied with fighting unnecessary conventional wars and developing anti-missile defense systems to anticipate such a primitive delivery system.

The explosives-laden underwear-worn by an airline passenger who had
previously been flagged as a potentially dangerous fanatic, and who had paid
cash for his ticket and had no checked luggage-was the terrorist's weapon of
choice, one that could have blown a hole in the side of Northwest Airlines'
Detroit-bound Flight 253 on Christmas Day, killing hundreds of innocents.
But it is not a weapon to be effectively countered with the deployment of
hundreds of thousands of American combat troops. Nor can it be stopped by
the hundreds of billions of dollars worth of planes, subs and missiles in
our arsenal of Cold War-era weapons, part of an annual defense budget that
is higher in inflation-adjusted dollars than at any time in the past
half-century.

In response to the 9/11 hijackers, armed with artillery that cost a couple
hundred dollars at most, we threw money and, more important, attention at
conventional military responses while neglecting the difficult police work
and the intelligence evaluation and civilian-focused technology necessary to
thwart homeland attacks.
Yes, there are evildoers out there that mean us harm, as President Bush
declaimed. But they are often the products of the best of Western education
who, as examples ranging from the lead 9/11 hijackers - the Hamburg group-to
the elite University College London-educated engineer in the latest incident
demonstrate, move more easily in urbane Western societies than in Afghan
villages.

The technology that could help detect a sophisticated plane hijacker or
suicide bomber has been largely botched in development and only
halfheartedly deployed even when it is available. On Tuesday, a devastating
report in The Washington Post revealed that the full-body scanning equipment
hyped after 9/11, which might have detected the explosives involved in last
week's incident, is still not in wide use. As the Post stated, "A plan that
would have helped focus the development of better screening technology and
procedures-including a risk-based assessment of aviation threats-is almost
two years overdue, according to a report this fall by the Government
Accountability Office, the investigative arm of Congress."

So, screening equipment that can detect plastic explosives exists, but it
was not used in this case and, as the GAO predicted, "TSA cannot ensure that
it is targeting the highest priority security needs at checkpoints; measure
the extent to which deployed technologies reduce the risk of terrorist
attacks; or make needed adjustments to its PSP [Passenger Screening Program]
strategy." As a result, the GAO concluded: "TSA lacks assurance that its
investments in screening technologies address the highest priority security
needs at airport passenger checkpoints."

The "systematic failure" in the nation's security that President Obama
referred to Tuesday derives from the war metaphor itself and from the
assumption, begun with Bush's irrational invasion of Iraq and extended with
Obama's escalation in Afghanistan, that terrorism is a military rather than
a criminal threat. The terrorists are not rebel fighters rooted, as are the
Taliban and the remnants of the Iraq insurgency, in their homeland struggles
and subject to being defeated on conventional battlefields.

Rather, they are rootless cosmopolitans of violence, alienated from any
stated homeland and free to move easily about the world, armed in almost
every instance with valid passports, visas and money to exploit our
inability to seriously evaluate our own intelligence data. They can count on
our top government officials ignoring blinking red warnings, as the Bush
White House did before 9/11, or the alarm of a well-connected and properly
concerned Nigerian banker-father.

Preventing terrorist attacks on the U.S. homeland has nothing to do with
occupying vast tracts of land or winning the hearts and minds of backward
villagers whom we falsely depict as surrogates of an evil empire, as we did
in Vietnam and are now doing in Afghanistan. What is needed is smart police
work to catch these highly mobile fanatics, and that begins with actually
reading and then acting on the readily available intelligence data. It
requires detectives with brains and not generals with firepower.

The ballooning of the defense budget after 9/11 has proved a great
boondoggle for the military-industrial complex, which suddenly found an
excuse to build weapons and deploy conventional forces against a superpower
enemy that no longer exists. But our stealth fighters and bombers designed
to defeat Soviet defenses that were never built are a poor match against a
terrorist's stealth underwear.