A Psychonaut License: The Psychedelic University
Drug Abuse
http://realitysandwich.com/psychonaut_license_psychedelic_university
A Psychonaut License: The Psychedelic University
Ido Hartogsohn
Most sincere and mindful people would not dispute that the use of psychedelics can,
under certain circumstances, have positive outcomes. Psychedelics, after all, have
played a crucial role in human culture for millennia and continue to be a part of
many cultures, even today.
The recreational use of LSD and other mind altering substances during the
psychedelic sixties is one of the main factors that frightened society away from the
exploration of psychedelic realms. As long as researchers and psychologists kept their
experiments with LSD confined to their laboratories and clinics, everything was fine.
But the widespread use of psychedelics among large sectors of society, with many
people having no knowledge about how to work with psychedelics, led western
society into a state of media frenzy and paranoia regarding all forms of consciousness
expansion. Psychedelics were rashly demonized and then outlawed without any
further discussion -- a fact which has been lamented ever since by psychedelic
advocates from fields such as psychology, theology and philosophy.
There's been little movement since the sixties toward the legalization of these
substances. Yet it seems that society's willingness to consider positive applications of
psychedelics has grown lately. Psychedelic research has finally begun to get back on
its feet after being put on hold for decades, and the public discussion of psychedelics
seems to be somewhat less ill informed than it had been in recent decades, as was
noted in Daniel Pinchbeck's article on the future of psychedelics.
Those who can go beyond the veil of propaganda and misinformation that cloaks the
entire territory can discover that, unlike many other perfectly legal and accepted
substances (such as coffee, alcohol or nicotine), psychedelics are actually non-
addictive, non-toxic drugs which in the long term have no adverse side effect on
body and brain functions.
When handled with care and in a knowledgeable, respectful manner, psychedelics
can have many desirable personal, psychological, philosophical, spiritual and creative
results. These facts are well known to the societies in which psychedelics have been a
part of the culture and religion for millennia.
The question of psychedelics
But despite the many merits they possess, psychedelics continue to have a highly
ambivalent reputation in our society and are prohibited in most countries.
The reasons behind this global paranoia about psychedelics are complex, but can be
summed up in the sentence: Psychedelics aren't dangerous, but careless, ignorant
use of psychedelics is.
Even Holland, which has the most liberal drugs laws in the world, is currently in the
process of banning the selling of magic mushrooms in local "smart shops." The
reason is, as it has been in the past, the occasional tragic cases in which newcomers
to the field of psychedelics (usually tourists, usually young people) experiment with
psychedelic drugs without much prior knowledge about their effects, the importance
of set and settings, and how they interact with other drugs (usually alcohol), etc.
Such blind sighted encounters with psychedelics are quite likely to lead to disaster.
And so we have the occasional jumping out of a window, or different forms of freak-
outs. It doesn't matter that the number of annual cases of this sort is less than a
dozen, while cigarettes kill 400,000 people a year.
Such unfortunate encounters with psychedelics are a side effect of modern society,
and are avoided by indigenous societies using psychedelics thanks to the ceremonial
manner in which psychedelics are consumed. This is because indigenous societies
partake in psychedelics at specific dates and times, in a religious context, and in the
company of shamans. The recreational use of such substances is almost unheard of.
Thus the ceremonial use of psychedelics is considered safer, more "dignified," and
has been legalized in many parts of the world.
Movements advocating the use of psychedelics in a religious context have indeed
seen a great surge in recent years, among them the Native American Church use of
peyote, and ayahuasca use by the Santo Daime and Uniao de Vegetal religions. Such
religions have managed thus far to eschew the stigma shed upon psychedelics by
society. Their existence is indeed very positive, but while people might have safer
access to psychedelics in these contexts, they do not support the use of psychedelics
for creative, psychological and philosophical purposes. These religious uses, as well
as psychotherapeutic uses of psychedelics, sacrifice the individual's freedom to
pursue psychedelic exploration in favor of being part of certain religious or
psychological institutions.
Society doesn't know how to handle psychedelics, and since we live in a capitalistic
society the choice about psychedelics has been reduced to: sell them or ban them.
It's not relevant that treating psychedelics as consumer products might not be a good
idea from the psychedelic perspective. Since our society is capitalistic, we quite
automatically apply the model of consumerism to anything that comes along.
However, psychedelics aren't your average consumer product. Far from it. And when
the choice is between selling them or banning them, most countries choose what
they consider the safe path: prohibition.
So, in an attempt to reverse the inertia associated with the image and legal status of
psychedelics, those who do believe that psychedelics can be put to good use and
benefit society have to find an alternative way to regulate them.
Various thinkers in the history of psychedelic thought have been aware of this issue.
Many of them believed that psychedelic substances need not be distributed in a
mass-consumption, capitalistic manner. Except perhaps for Ken Kesey, nearly every
major psychedelic advocate has also called for strategies to make sure that
psychedelics are properly handled and intelligently used.
Albert Hofmann cautioned against the recreational use of psychedelics and believed
that their importance lies "in the possibility of providing material help to
meditation."[1] Aldous Huxley wanted to give psychedelics to a small intellectual elite.
He spoke about the development of "a technique of applied mysticism" -- a
technique for helping individuals to get the most out of their transcendental
experience and to make use of the insights from the "OTHER WORLD" in the affairs
of "This World."[2] Timothy Leary wanted psychedelics to be distributed to small
groups of people in a psychological or religious context.[3] Even Terrence McKenna
admitted that not everybody in a psychedelic society has to actually take any
drugs.[4]
Yet the question remains, how will society determine which people it deems fit to
experiment with psychedelic substances? Religious and psychological systems are, as
mentioned above, unsatisfactory forums for tapping the full potential of psychedelic
exploration in modern society. At the same time, selling psychedelics as a standard
consumer product has its own disadvantages, which is why we have prohibition.
The Psychonaut License Model
These questions and the need to advance the field of psychedelics have led me to
develop an alternative model for the regulation and use of psychedelics in society. I
refer to it as the Psychonaut License Model. This model, as I have recently found out,
was actually already proposed by Leary in the Sixties. But for some reason or another
it seems to have been forgotten for all these years. Here I would like to offer a
variation of this model for your consideration.
Our society has mechanisms for the handling of objects which it deems both helpful
as well as dangerous. In order to drive a car or a plane, for example, you need a
license. What if we would have a psychonautic license? A license for exploring your
mind. A license that would ensure that use of psychedelics is guaranteed to those
who are willing to approach them knowledgably and responsibly.
A person would receive such a license after taking part in a psychedelic course. Such
a psychonautic course could consist of 10-15 meetings, or a concentrated term of
7-10 days. Each course would educate the aspiring psychonaut about a specific
substance, such as LSD, Magic Mushrooms, Ayahuasca, Mescaline, Cannabis, etc.
Classes would deal with key questions about psychedelics, such as: the role of
psychedelics in culture, the history of psychedelics, psychedelics and ecology, the
chemistry of psychedelics, the medical aspects of psychedelics, psychedelic
psychology (how to psychologically deal with the various aspects of a psychedelic
trip), psychedelic theory and psychedelic spirituality. Thankfully our community is not
suffering from a lack of valuable psychedelic knowledge.
The teachers would be cutting-edge experts from the various fields of psychedelics:
psychedelic thinkers, shamans, medical doctors, historians of psychedelics and
psychedelic psychologists.
Each course would also include 2-3 carefully built, practical psychedelic ceremonies,
guided by knowledgeable individuals. These teachers would strike the balance
between allowing the freedom for individual exploration, while ensuring a structured
(at least partly structured) psychedelic learning experience.
I believe that such a carefully guided tour through the psychedelic world might be a
modern version of ancient initiation ceremonies. It would allow for potential explorers
of the psychedelic realms to start their journey in safer, more stable surroundings,
setting the stage for more individualized psychedelic experiences in the future.
Such a solution could also set the stage for the reintegration of psychedelics into the
social fabric in a way which would be better accepted by society. It would also build
the basis for a stronger psychedelic community and allow for the growth of
psychedelic research and techniques.
The Psychedelic University
The establishment of such a psychonaut license would of course demand the
establishment of a stable, professional institution. Hence, the idea for the Psychedelic
University, a nonprofit foundation devoted to spreading unbiased knowledge about
psychedelics, and supporting individuals seeking safe, informed and inspirational
access to psychedelic substances.
The establishment of such an institute demands a tolerant legal environment. To the
best of my knowledge, such an environment exists in only one place in the world at
the moment. So the Psychedelic University should be located in Amsterdam, Holland
where it can act in total agreement with the Dutch law.
The Netherlands has been looking for various ways to regulate the use of
psychedelics. While Holland has been tolerant of psychedelics, recent tragedies have
weakened its liberal stance. Since the country continues to reform its drug laws every
few years, it seems that Dutch authorities are still looking for a sensible solution
regarding the regulation of psychedelics. The Psychedelic University and the
Psychonautic License model respond to the need for such models, and offer an
alternative that enables a safe, responsible and yet imaginative introduction into the
world of psychedelics.
The purpose of the Psychedelic University is not to polemicize, but to make an
example of the psychedelic movement, displaying its radical commitment to the
responsible and constructive use of psychoactive substances. Referring to the future
of the psychedelic movement, Terrence McKenna said, "Pointing back to my notion
that the responsibility always rests on us and that you don't want to go out and really
form a movement to change those guys or that bureau -- I think the thing that
should be done is: people who are involved in psychedelics should live life of such
examplitude and impeccability that the notion that there was anything shay or wrong
or curious about this phenomenon would be ludicrous."[5] Making sure that
psychedelically inclined individuals get the best drug education would be a first step
in that direction.
While the Psychedelic University will not in any way seek to become a governmental
institution, its success might encourage the Dutch government and other liberal
governments to consider the implementation of this model elsewhere in the world.
Such a university would also, in time, become a center for psychedelic research,
collaborating with institutions such as MAPS in the furthering of psychedelic
knowledge
Our dream is to enable any person on the planet legal and safe access to these
sacred substances, which we value so highly, and to help in the distribution of
psychedelic knowledge.
While the criminalization of psychedelics has been seen as nearly irrevocable for
decades, new possibilities are also emerging. Legalization and the creation of a new
path are not a dream.
FOOTNOTES:
[1] Hofmann, Lsd: My Problem Child, 209.
[2] In a letter to Albert Hofmann from the 29th of February 1961, quoted on Albert
Hoffman's Lsd: My Problem Child, 179-180.
[3] Leary engages these questions freely on his radio interview on June 17, 1969
which can be found at:
http://www.matrixmasters.net/blogs/?p=264
[4] Mckenna's view on this matter can be found at the end of his lecture at the Santa
Barbara Psychedelic Convention of 1983 where he says: "The idea of psychedelic
society is something new, and it doesn't necessarily mean that everybody takes the
drugs. It merely means that the complexity and the mysteriousness of mind are
centered in the consciousness of the civilization as the mystery which it comes from
and which it must relate to in order to be relevant". The recording of this speech can
be found here:
http://www.matrixmasters.net/blogs/?p=203
[5] McKenna gives this explanation in response to a question from the audience at a
lecture on June 1984 which can be found here:
http://www.matrixmasters.net/blogs/?p=234
__
Last Updated (Monday, 03 January 2011 23:40)