Pubdate: Wed, 3 Nov 2010
Source: San Francisco Chronicle (CA)
Page: A - 16
Webpage: http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2010/11/03/MNUD1G3CL7.DTL
Copyright: 2010 Hearst Communications Inc.
Contact: http://www.sfgate.com/chronicle/submissions/#1
Website: http://www.sfgate.com/chronicle/
Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/388
Author: Kevin Fagan, Chronicle Staff Writer
Cited: Proposition 19 http://yeson19.com/
Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/topic/Proposition+19
Bookmark: http://mapinc.org/find?272 (Proposition 19)

'Resounding' Defeat For Proposition 19

SAN FRANCISCO -- California voters on Tuesday soundly defeated
Proposition 19, the nation's most sweeping proposal ever to legalize
marijuana sales and use.

The measure would have legalized possession of as much as an ounce of
marijuana for personal, recreational use by anybody 21 or older, and
would have allowed people to grow cannabis in a 5-by-5-foot space.

It also would have permitted local governments to regulate and tax
commercial sale and production, which proponents said would have
injected billions of dollars into shrunken government coffers.

"This is a resounding victory," said Tim Rosales, manager of the No
on 19 campaign. "Men, women, Democrats, Republicans - all types of
voters voted against this measure. I think that's a huge statement,
not only for California but the rest of the country."

Marijuana advocates took heart that the issue had been taken seriously.

"The fact that millions of Californians voted to legalize marijuana
is a tremendous victory," said Richard Lee, founder of the Oaksterdam
cannabis university in Oakland and the author of Prop. 19. "We have
broken the glass ceiling. Prop. 19 has changed the terms of the
debate. And that was a major strategic goal.

"Over the course of the last year, it has become clear that the
legalization of marijuana is no longer a question of if, but a
question of when."

Straight-Ahead Fight

The two sides' messages boiled down simply during the campaign.
Pro-19 forces pinned their hopes on convincing Californians that
taxing pot would help shore up budgets, and on young people - who
polled in favor of pot in general - coming out to vote in big numbers.

Opponents of the measure argued that Prop. 19's provision that local
governments set their own regulations and taxes would set up a
confusing snarl of rules that varied city to city, county to county -
and would still be illegal under federal law.

That message was reinforced last month when U.S. Attorney General
Eric Holder said he would "vigorously enforce" federal anti-pot laws
when it came to recreational use, no matter what Californians decided.

Opponents also maintained that expanding marijuana use would lead to
more people working and driving while stoned.

Both major party candidates for governor, Mothers Against Drunk
Driving and numerous police groups, including the California Police
Chiefs Association, weighed in against Prop. 19.

Those endorsing the measure included the California branch of the
NAACP, several labor unions, the National Latino Officers Association
and a sizable number of retired police officials.

Growers split

There was a split of opinion among those who already grow marijuana
and make it the biggest cash crop in California.

Some growers were afraid that legalizing recreational use would drop
the price of pot so far that they could go bankrupt. Others thought
that wider weed use could lead to bigger profits as pot-heavy parts
of the state - particularly the "Emerald Triangle" of Mendocino,
Humboldt and Trinity counties - offered boutique weed-using
experiences along the lines of Napa Valley and its wine industry.

The situation was muddied further when Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger
signed a law Sept. 30 that dropped the penalty for possession of an
ounce of pot from a misdemeanor to an infraction punishable by a $100 fine.

Roger Salazar, spokesman for Public Safety First, the principal
organization opposing the measure, said the infraction law, Holder's
pronouncement and the overwhelming opposition to Prop. 19 by
newspaper editorial boards up and down the state had swung the
election to his side.

"All of those things put together made voters take pause and say,
'Hey, maybe we ought to re-read this thing and see what it actually
does - and more importantly, what it doesn't do, " Salazar said.

"The risks of legalizing a drug for the first time was too scary for people."

Also on Bay Area ballots were six local measures proposing taxes or
controls on medical marijuana. All were passing handily.

Among them were Berkeley's Measure S, which will impose a 2.5 percent
tax on medical pot. Measure T amends Berkeley's medicinal pot
ordinance to restrict dispensaries to commercial areas, and limit
cultivation, baking and product development of weed to six locations.

Other cities whose voters opted to impose new marijuana taxes were
Oakland, San Jose, Albany and Richmond.
________________________________________

Pubdate: Wed, 3 Nov 2010
Page: A17
Source: Los Angeles Times (CA)
Copyright: 2010 Los Angeles Times
Contact: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
Website: http://www.latimes.com/
Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/248
Authors: John Hoeffel, Reporting from Los Angeles, Maria L. La Ganga,
Reporting from Oakland
Cited: Proposition 19 http://yeson19.com/
Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/topic/Proposition+19
Bookmark: http://mapinc.org/find?272 (Proposition 19)

YOUTH VOTE FALTERS; PROP. 19 FALLS SHORT

California Would Have Become the First State to Allow Marijuana to Be
Sold for Recreational Use.

After taking a serious look at legalizing marijuana, Californians
voted Tuesday to reject Proposition 19, which would have made the
state the first to allow the drug to be sold for recreational use.

The measure drew strong support from voters younger than 25, as the
campaign had hoped, but those voters did not turn out in unusually
high numbers, according to a state exit poll. The initiative also
failed to win over the moderate voters who make up the state's
decisive swing vote.

The San Francisco Bay Area was the only region to tilt toward the
measure, but it did so just slightly. In Los Angeles County, where a
quarter of the state's voters live, the initiative lost.

Despite a potential double-digit loss, marijuana-legalization
advocates said the proposition had transformed talk about legal pot
from a late-night punch line into a serious policy matter.

"This has been a watershed moment," said Stephen Gutwillig, the
California director for the Drug Policy Alliance, which waged an
extensive ad campaign for the measure. "Even in defeat, Proposition
19 has moved marijuana legalization into the mainstream of American politics."

Tuesday's vote was just the first round, say legalization advocates,
who are aiming measures at the 2012 ballot in Washington, Oregon,
Colorado and very likely California. But it's also the second time in
two years that California voters have rejected an initiative to
soften penalties for drug crimes.

"The cover of the book looked nice, but it didn't read very well,"
said Roger Salazar, the spokesman for the opposition campaign. "This
specific initiative was massively flawed."

Richard Lee, the medical marijuana entrepreneur who spearheaded the
initiative and spent $1.5 million on the historic campaign, pledged
to work with the initiative's critics to draft a new one.

"We won tonight. We won for the last six months, the last year, all
the years we've been fighting. We're going to keep fighting," Lee
told supporters who gathered inside and outside Oaksterdam
University, the Oakland medical marijuana trade school he founded.

California's 1996 medical marijuana initiative, the first in the
nation, has led to more liberal attitudes toward pot nationwide as
similar programs spread to 13 other states and the nation's capital.
On Tuesday, voters in Arizona and South Dakota were deciding whether
to approve programs; voters in Oregon were weighing whether to allow
storefront dispensaries.

Proposition 19's backers had hoped voters worried about the economy
would embrace the measure as a way to raise new taxes. In 10 cities,
including San Jose, Sacramento and Long Beach, voters appeared to be
overwhelmingly approving taxes on medical and recreational marijuana.

Passage of Proposition 19 would have vaulted the state into unmapped
territory, invigorated the movement to legalize marijuana and set up
a dramatic confrontation with the federal government.

The initiative would have eliminated all criminal penalties for
adults 21 and older who planted marijuana in a plot of up to 25
square feet or possessed up to an ounce for personal use. It also
would have allowed city councils and county supervisors to authorize
commercial cultivation and retail sales.

But the opposition was broad, according to the poll conducted by
Edison Research for the National Voter Pool, a consortium of the
major television news networks and the Associated Press. Men and
women opposed it. Voters of every race opposed it. The campaign had
hoped black and Latino voters would see the measure as a way to end
disproportionate arrests of minorities caught with marijuana.

The measure drew intense interest. Foreign leaders weighed in. All
the top statewide candidates opposed it. The federal drug czar
denounced it. And the U.S. attorney general pledged to "vigorously
enforce" federal narcotics laws whatever California did.

Americans tuned in to the Proposition 19 debate. More than four
decades after the war on drugs was declared, the country is almost
evenly divided on whether to legalize marijuana.

In California, half of the voters consistently tell pollsters they
favor legal marijuana and a tenth are unsure. In September, support
for the initiative crept above the halfway mark, triggering euphoria
among advocates. But voters became skeptical about the details.

Opponents exploited their doubts by mocking it in radio ads and
suggesting that it would create an epidemic of dope-addled teenagers,
motorists and nurses. Proponents said it would control marijuana as
alcohol is controlled, allow police to focus on serious crimes,
curtail the black market and raise billions in taxes, but they opened
themselves to criticism by overstating those claims.

Lee once hoped to raise $20 million for the campaign, but big-money
donors stayed out until the end. Proponents raised about $4.2
million, almost a third in the last two weeks.
__________________________________________

_______________________________________________
THS mailing list