59.4%United States United States
8.7%United Kingdom United Kingdom
5%Canada Canada
4%Australia Australia
3.5%Philippines Philippines
2.6%Netherlands Netherlands
2.4%India India
1.6%Germany Germany
1%France France
0.7%Poland Poland

Today: 214
Yesterday: 251
This Week: 214
Last Week: 2221
This Month: 4802
Last Month: 6796
Total: 129401

Effectiveness And Cost Effectiveness Of Expanding Harm Reduction And Antiretroviral Therapy In A Mixed HIV Epidemic: A Modeling Analysis For Ukraine


Drug Abuse
Effectiveness And Cost Effectiveness Of Expanding Harm Reduction And
Antiretroviral Therapy In A Mixed HIV Epidemic: A Modeling Analysis For
Ukraine

 
A new study from Stanford researchers published in PLoS Medicine makes the
case that a combination of methadone substitution therapy and
anti-retroviral treatment would have the greatest effect on reducing new
infections and improving quality of life in a region where HIV is spreading
rapidly among intravenous drug users. 
 
In the past decade, an epidemic of HIV has swept through Ukraine, fueled
mostly by intravenous drug use. Of Ukraine's approximately 390,000
intravenous drug users as many as half are HIV-infected. Researchers at
Stanford and Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System have
demonstrated, using a cost-effectiveness modeling study, that the most
effective way to combat the spreading disease is a combined program of drug
substitution - providing methadone for opiate users, for instance - and
anti-retroviral therapy for those already infected with HIV. 
 
"HIV is spreading in Eastern Europe more quickly than in any other part of
the world," said Margaret Brandeau, the Coleman F. Fung Professor of
Engineering at Stanford University and senior author of the study. "Our
study shows that substitution therapy for injection drug users is an
inexpensive and effective means of curbing HIV transmission in the region." 
 
With no further intervention, the study predicts that HIV prevalence will
reach 67.2 percent in intravenous drug users in 20 years. The authors
further show that providing drug-substitution to just 25 percent of
intravenous drug users today could lower that figure considerably. 
 
"Not only does drug substitution therapy work, but it is remarkably
cost-effective when you consider total costs of treating and caring for a
growing HIV-infected community," said lead author Sabina Alistar. 
 
"Providing effective drug substitution therapy and HIV antiretroviral
therapy together to the injection-drug-using community protects the entire
population - it actually prevents more infections in non-drug users than in
the drug-using community," said Douglas K. Owens, co-author and a senior
investigator at the VA Palo Alto Health Care System and professor of
medicine at Stanford University. 
 
Funding: This research was supported by Grant Number R01DA15612 from the
National Institute on Drug Abuse. Sabina S. Alistar is also supported by a
Stanford Graduate Fellowship. Dr. Owens is supported by the Department of
Veterans Affairs. The funders had no role in study design, data collection
and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. 
 
Competing Interests: DKO received an honorarium from Quintiles to prepare a
continuing medical education lecture about HIV screening. No other competing
interests have been declared. 
 
Citation: Alistar SS, Owens DK, Brandeau ML (2011) Effectiveness and Cost
Effectiveness of Expanding Harm Reduction and Antiretroviral Therapy in a
Mixed HIV Epidemic: A Modeling Analysis for Ukraine. PLoS Med 8(3):
e1000423. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000423 
 
Source: 
PLoS Medicine