REFERENCES

1. Johnson BD, Golub A, Dunlap E. The rise and decline of hard drugs, drug markets, and violence in inner-city New York. In Blumstein A & Wallman J (eds.), The crime drop in America. Cambridge University Press. 2000: 164.

2. Martin I, Palepu A, Wood E, Li K, Montaner J, Kerr T. Violence among street-involved youth: the role of methamphetamine. European Addiction Research. 2009; 15: 32.

3. Romero-Daza N, Weeks M, Singer M. “Nobody gives a damn if I live or die”: violence, drugs, and street-level prostitution in inner-city Hartford, Connecticut. Medical Anthropology. 2003; 22: 233.

4. Ousey GC, Lee MR. Investigating the connections between race, illicit drug markets, and lethal violence, 1984-1997. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency. 2004; 41: 352.

5. Blumstein A. Youth violence, guns, and the illicit-drug industry. Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology. 1995; 86: 10.

6. Goldstein PJ, Brownstein HH, Ryan PJ, Bellucci PA. Crack and homicide in New York City, 1988: a conceptually based event analysis. Contemporary Drug Problems. 1989; 16: 36.

7. Brownstein HH, Crimmins SM, Spunt BJ. A conceptual framework for operationalizing the relationship between violence and drug market stability. Contemporary Drug Problems. 2000; 27: 867.

8. Guerrero R. Epidemiology of violence in the Americas: the case of Colombia. In Burki SJ, Aiyer S, Hommes R (eds.), Poverty & inequality: annual World Bank conference on development in Latin America and the Caribbean 1996 proceedings. World Bank Publications. 1998: 95.

9. Donohue III JJ, Levitt SD. Guns, violence, and the efficiency of illegal markets. American Economic Review. 1998: 463.

10. Decker SH. Policing gangs and youth violence. Wadsworth Publishing. 2003.

11. Hutson HR, Anglin D, Kyriacou D, Hart J, Spears K. The epidemic of gang-related homicides in Los Angeles County from 1979 through 1994. Journal of the American Medical Association. 1995; 274: 6.

12. Castle A. Statistical overview of homicides in British Columbia, 1997-2007: 2009 update. Vancouver: Royal Canadian Mounted Police; 2009.

13. Levitt SD, Venkatesh SA. An economic analysis of a drug-selling gang’s finances. Quarterly Journal of Economics. 2000: 35.

14. Levitt S, Rubio M. Understanding crime in Colombia and what can be done about it. In Alesina A (ed.), Institutional reforms: the case of Colombia. MIT Press. 2005: 131.

15. Elsworth C. Mexicans send in troops for drug war. Telegraph. December 13, 2006.

16. Associated Press. Mexico: 1,000 killed in drug violence so far in ’09. USA Today. February 26, 2009.

17. Lange J. From spas to banks, Mexico economy rides on drugs. Reuters. January 22, 2010.

18. Government of Canada. National Anti-Drug Strategy. Ottawa: Government of Canada; 2008.

19. Elovich R, Drucker E. On drug treatment and social control: Russian narcology’s great leap backwards. Harm Reduction Journal. 2008; 5: 23.

20. Roberts M, Trace M, Klein A. Thailand’s ‘War on Drugs’. London: Beckley Foundation; 2004.

21. ONDCP. FY2010 budget summary. Washington, DC: Office of National Drug Control Policy; 2009.

22. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG; PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. British Medical Journal. 2009; 339: b2535.

23. Miron JA. Violence, guns, and drugs: a cross-country analysis. Journal of Law and Economics. 2001; 44: 615.

24. Resignato AJ. Violent crime: a function of drug use or drug enforcement? Applied Economics. 2000; 32: 681.

25. Miron JA. Violence and the US prohibitions of drugs and alcohol. American Law and Economics Review. 1999; 1: 78.

26. Caulkins J, Reuter P, Taylor LJ. Can supply restrictions lower price? violence, drug dealing and positional advantage. Contributions to Economic Analysis & Policy. 2006; 5: 20.

27. Shepard EM, Blackley PR. Drug enforcement and crime: recent evidence from New York State. Social Science Quarterly. 2005; 86: 323.

28. Burrus RT. Do efforts to reduce the supply of illicit drugs increase turf war violence? a theoretical analysis. Journal of Economics and Finance. 1999; 23: 226.

29. Riley KJ. Homicide and drugs: a tale of six cities. Homicide Studies. 1998; 2: 31.

30. Benson BL, Leburn IS, Rasmussen DW. The impact of drug enforcement on crime: an investigation of the opportunity cost of police resources. Journal of Drug Issues. 2001; 31: 989.

31. Benson BL, Rasmussen DW. Deterrence and public policy: trade-offs in the allocation of police resources. International Review of Law and Economics. 1998; 18: 24.

32. Brumm HJ, Cloninger DO. The drug war and the homicide rate: a direct correlation? The Cato Journal. 1995; 14: 8.

33. Rasmussen DW, Benson BL, Sollars DL. Spatial competition in illicit drug markets: the consequences of increased drug war enforcement. Review of Regional Studies. 1993; 123: 219.

34. Maher L, Dixon D. Policing and public health: law enforcement and harm minimization in a street-level drug market. British Journal of Criminology. 1999; 39: 488.

35. Maher L, Dixon D. The cost of crackdowns: policing Cabramatta’s heroin market. Current Issues in Criminal Justice. 2001; 13: 5.

36. Riley D, O’Hare PA. Reducing the harms of drugs and HIV: policies & practices around the world. XII International AIDS Conference. 1998; 12: 667 (abstract no. 33388).

37. Bagley B. Drug trafficking, political violence and US policy in Colombia in the 1990s. Available at: http:// www.mamacoca.org/junio2001/bagley_drugs_and_violence_en.htm.

38. UNODC. World drug report 2005. Vienna: United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime; 2005.

39. Cornwell S. Rice to Mexico for talks on drugs. Reuters. October 21, 2008.

40. Morris SK. Colombia: prohibition’s frontline. International Journal of Drug Policy. 2003; 14: 209.

41. Felbab-Brown V. Afghanistan: when counternarcotics undermines counterterrorism. Washington Quarterly. 2005; 28: 55.

42. Destrebecq D, Leggett T. Cocaine trafficking in West Africa: the threat to stability and development (with special reference to Guinea-Bissau). Vienna: United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime; 2007.

43. Easton ST. Marijuana growth in British Columbia. Public Policy Sources 74. Vancouver, BC: Fraser Institute; 2004.

44. Statistics British Columbia. BC GDP by industry: NAICS aggregations. bus_stat/bcea/BCEAchnd.asp

45. UNODC. World drug report 2009. Vienna: United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime; 2009.

46. Cornell SE. Narcotics and armed conflict: interaction and implications. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism. 2007; 30: 207.

47. Pettit W, Western B. Mass imprisonment and the life course: race and class inequality in U.S. incarceration. American Sociological Review. 2004; 69: 151.

48. Shoveling up: the impact of substance abuse on state budgets. New York: National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse at Columbia University; 2001.

49. Gaskins S. “Women of circumstance”—The effects of mandatory minimum sentencing on women minimally involved in drug crimes. American Criminal Law Review. 2004; 41: 1533.

50. Meierhoefer BS. The general effect of mandatory minimum prison terms. Washington, DC: Federal Judicial Centre; 1992.

51. Mascharka C. Mandatory minimum sentences: exemplifying the law of unintended consequences. Florida State University Law Review. 2000; 28: 935.

52. Caulkins J, Rydell CP, Schwabe W, Chiesa J. Mandatory minimum drug sentences: throwing away the key or the taxpayers’ money? Santa Monica: RAND Corporation; 1997.

53. Warren J, Gelb A, Horowitz J, Riordan J. One in 100: behind bars in America 2008. Washington, DC: Pew Center on the States; 2008.

54. Degenhardt L, Chiu W-T, Sampson N, et al. Toward a global view of alcohol, tobacco, cannabis, and cocaine use: Findings from the WHO World Mental Health Surveys. PLoS Medicine. 2008; 5: 1053.

55. Manski CF, Pepper JV, Petrie CV. Informing America’s policy on illegal drugs: what we don’t know keeps hurting us. Washington, DC: National Research Council, National Academy of Sciences; 2001.

56. UNODC. World Drug Report 2008. Vienna: United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime; 2008.

57. Rolles S. After the War on Drugs: blueprint for regulation. London: Transform Drug Policy Foundation; 2009.

58. Ingenito R. Prepared testimony of Robert Ingenito. Sacramento: California State Board of Equalization; 2009.

59. Greenwald G. Drug decriminalization in Portugal: lessons for creating fair and successful drug policies. Washington, DC: Cato Institute; 2009.

60. Pearson H. A hard habit to break. Nature. 2004; 430: 2.

61. Saunders JB. Publication bias in addiction research. Drug and Alcohol Review. 2007; 26: 3.